CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY SURVIVAL GUIDE
Topic: Children's Aid Society
http://fighting4families.webs.com/letters/Family%20Survial%20Guide.pdf

Joshen Cohen won the right to speak for disabled man

www.janescharf.com

 

Today in Divisional Court Joshua Cohen presented a motion requesting leave of the court to speak on behalf of Roger Morin the mentally challenged man who was falsely labeled a pedophile. 

 

Initially the judge said no to Josh's request to speak on Roger's behalf because she said he had no standing. Josh read off several case law references that demonstrate the court has the authority to let him speak for Roger especially since Roger is mentally delayed.

 

Josh also brought up the fact that I had been granted leave to speak on behalf of Lorraine Paquin in a Divisional Court for a Judicial Review. The Judge then changed her position and let Josh go ahead and speak about the readiness for the trial, which will be held the week of June 13, 2011.

 

Josh is well prepared to make Rogers case in front of three Judges. The Child and Family Review Board closed Roger’s case after they found him eligible for a review with no reason given. This is what is the topic of Judicial Review.

 

I am looking forward to a victory in this case because there has been such a long-standing injustice towards Rogers by the CAS.

 

Ultimately Josh is looking at trying to get Roger reunited with his children and of course have his name cleared.

 

I personally think Roger’s case is such a shame to the CAS it might lead to the investigation that will blow off its corrupt doors and reveal its insidious underbelly of this child napping industry leading to the doors being closed for good. We need a government agency to handle child protection like every other province in Canada and a private unaccountable money grabbing baby snatching outfit.

 

 

Jane Scharf

 

Children's Aid Society Reign of Terror
Topic: Children's Aid Society

WWW.JANESCHARF.COM

 

I am providing a very shocking update to the post I made on July 19, 2010. This young woman has been constantly under attack by vicious CAS workers acting in bad faith since that time.

 

All of a sudden they turned on her at the end of July 2010 the same week the ombudsman’s office was advised of her case and a related case involving Roger Morin a 42 year old mentally delayed man who CAS labeled as a pedophile when he was in his 20's. He was labled a pedophile even though he had never been accused or convicted of any offense against a child. His two children were taken from him at birth based on this false label. He was labeled as a pedophile by forcing him to have a:

 

Penile plethysmograph 

 

This test involves putting electrodes on a man's penis and then showing him naked pictures to measure the sexual response. This test was given to this man by Dr. Bradford head of the Royal Ottawa Hospital in the 1990's. The results were given to the CAS upon their request (and they paid for this consultation with Bradford) without the knowledge or consent of his patient Roger or his mother who was his caregiver at that time. And the results were used to remove Rogers’s children from him at birth.

 

In 2006 a group of international forensic psychiatrists meet in Ottawa to discuss the use of this penile test on persons with mental delay.  The result was that this group which included Dr. Bradford found it was not valid when used on individuals with mental delay and recommended that it not be use this way in the future. Also the BC Supreme Court found it was not useful for predictions or treatement or any other purpose and it was a intrusive rights violation and they recommended that the BC Government outlaw the test altogether which they did. So it seems the label placed on Roger made solely on a prediction was not valid. But nevertheless even though the test was found to be a useless prediction tool and the fact that there was no evidence that he acted as a pedophile before the test or for all the years after the test (over twenty) CAS removed this mother’s child from her because this man was her friend. They put in the court paperwork the child was put at risk of sexual abuse by the mother. The mother reported at the time of apprehension (at birth) that she was unaware of these accusations against this man but that she was prepared to disassociate from him until the matter is cleared up (which she did do immediately). In disregard to her statement and actions in this regard they took the infant anyway and changed course to try and make her out to be mentally ill and incompetent which they have failed to do.

 

Because there was no lacking in her capacity to care for the infant the society insisted that she have a psychological assessment, which she did. The doctor did not confirm their predictions that she is dangerous and he did not confirm she was delayed. He only found her to be unrealistic in some of her expectations because she is so young only 19 and therefore recommended some additional community parenting and CAS infant stimulation. And he clearly stated that he was "definitely not recommending crown wardship at this time and this would not be in the child's best interest". Nevertheless the CAS is pressing on for permanent crown wardship with no access to the mother and CAS also refused to provide the recommended infant stimulation classes.

 

One other issue I forgot to point out is that this aggressive approach taken in this case with fabrication of facts occuring in this case happens almost in every case where a mother is young especially if she was in CAS herself as this mother was. A pamphlet paid for by the Ontario Government distributed by the Family Court Counter at the courthouse 161 Elgin St, Ottawa states that CAS can take your child at birth if "you are a teen mother especially if you were once in the care of the CAS." To this end the CAS frequents the homes and programs to help teen mothers and this is how the the young mothers are identified and stocked until the get to the hospital where the hospital is then required to notifiy CAS and the infants are removed from the mother hours after birth. They snatch the baby and then use their vast resources (provided by taxpayers by the government with no accountability about how the money is used) and their corrupt community contacts to make their case against the mother who has done nothing wrong.

 

There never was any child protection issue in this case in the first place and still there are  no child protection issues yet they still have her infant in their so-called "care".

 

They have tried every trick in the book to undermine her relationship with her son from pressuring her to force feed him when he is not hungry to following him around inches away from him every minute during his attempts to learn how to walk. And in an effort to create cause they advised her to put out several toys at a time for when he arrived in the mornings, which had the effect of drawing his interest towards the toys. Then they jumped on this and said the mother was not establishing eye contact with her son. The mother did catch on to this and changed the routine to taking one toy out at a time and interacting with her son with it. The first day she did this their "eye contact" during these sessions was effected. The issue disappeared. The CAS worker spends the next several weeks pressuring her go back to the previous routine in order to undermine her ability to maintain eye contact during her activity sessions.

 

The Doctor saw good eye contact and rapour between mother and child when he observed them together during a visit.

 

The CAS access workers also spend a great deal of time trying to undermine the activities the mother was doing by continuously calling and making noises to get her sons attention. Finally this was caught on video that was taken by the access worker at Christmas time. What she filmed for the mother was the activity between the child and mother opening the child’s presents. After this evidence was captured this intrusiveness stopped.

They have also lied numerous times to the court about the mother and on one occasion they got caught telling the court that that a court appearance was to be moved on consent of both the mother and CAS when in fact the mother was not asked. This was the first time I saw the court reprimand CAS.

 

The matter is soon going to trial now and the CAS are playing major games trying to withhold a doctors report that states he is not recommending crown wardship at this time.

 

This week they called the mother in and told her they were considering placing her son with her aunt. They contacted the aunt without the knowledge or consent of the mother. And they stated to the mother that they were going to do this whether she wanted them to or not. The aunt home is not suitable but the mother should not have to deal with this because the CAS had no right to breach the mother and child's confidence by advising the aunt she had a child and an aunt has no custodial rights. This is pure intimidation and abuse.

 

The only other issue they have identified besides the eye contact issue which is nonexistent now is that on one occasion in 12 months she was checking the bottle after heating and before she was finished the effort the CAS access worker said let me have the bottle and checked it on her own arm and found it to hot. So even though the mother was not finished the effort of checking and cooling the CAS access worker put the matter down as extreme incompetence.

 

This agency is this far out of control because they have no oversight from the government of any kind. They lie and break the law on an on going basis and nothing is done.

Contrary to the recommendation from the Doctor not to place the child as a crown ward the CAS is pressing on with their eye contact and one hot bottle issues for full permanent custody of her son with no contact with her.

Well myself and many other conscientious people are working very hard to change this and we are hoping their 140 year reign of terror will be over this year. When the public and court learn of what they have done to this vulnerable man and young mother the court of public opinion will come down hard.

 

Remember the Red Cross scandal well this one is far worse and has been going on for much longer. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.

 

Jane Scharf.

 

Jesus the Rebel
Topic: Jesus the Rebel

"Jesus was from the point of view of the High Priest a heretic and an
impostor. From the point of view of the merchants he was a rioter and a
Communist. From the Roman Imperialist point of view he was a traitor. From
the common sense point of view he was a dangerous mad man. From the
snobbish point of view, always a very influential one, he was a penniless vagrant.

"From the police point of view he was an obstructer of thoroughfares, a
beggar, an associate of prostitutes, an apologist of sinners, and a disparager of
judges; and his daily companions were tramps whom he had seduced into
vagabondage from their regular trades. From the point of view of the pious he
was a Sabbath breaker, a denier of the efficacy of circumcision and the advocate
of a strange rite of baptism, a gluttonous man and a wine bibber. He was
abhorrent to the medical profession as an unqualified practitioner who healed
people by quackery and charged nothing for the treatment.

"He was against the priests, against the judiciary, against the military,
against the city (he declared that it was impossible for a rich man to enter the
kingdom of heaven), against all the interests, classes, principalities and powers,
inviting everybody to abandon all these and follow him.

"By every argument, legal, political, religious, customary and polite, he was
the most complete enemy of the society of his time ever brought to the bars. He
was guilty on every count of the indictment, and on many more that his accusers
had not the wit to frame. If he was innocent then the whole world was guilty. To
acquit him was to throw over Civilisation and all its institutions. History has
borne out the case against him; for no State has ever constituted itself on his
principles or made it possible to live according to his commandments."

Bernard Shaw wrote the above cited commentary on Jesus in the preface to his
play on the Rocks (1933).

THE CHILDREN"S AID HAS GOT TO GO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Topic: Children's Aid Society
@font-face { font-family: "Cambria"; }p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal { margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman"; }div.Section1 { page: Section1; }

I am normally a positive optimistic person. And I create the Christmas's that I want and I usually always enjoy them. But this Christmas is different. I am embroiled in a bitter fight with CAS over the arbitrary abduction of a baby. This organization is more psycho than any corporation I have ever had the displeasure of fighting. It got me feeling like this is a war as outrageous as any. The poor and vulnerable are the victims of these vicious corporate attacks and big government funding and baby selling including to the highest bidder on international baby markets are the stacks.

The young woman that I am backing is a trooper. She takes the blows and comes right back at them. She has a team of 10 activists behind her and we expect her to win but what of the usual situation. Even the lawyers on both sides help the CAS "make their case" by lying, manipulating and pressuring their own clients into compliance with the CAS's wishes. And judges for the most part go along and endorse whatever the CAS wants.

For Christmas next year I want to the see the CAS doors closed forever with a government take over. Not that government has a spotless record when it comes to managing this type of affair but it has a better track record than this hideous private corporation that has been snatching babies and destroying families for over 140 years.

And bare in mind that 1) apprehentions are up 130% annually since 2003 when Mike Harris put a predium rate in place for funding. CAS gets so much when they open a file for investigation, so much for an apprehention, and so much for an adoption.

One woman I helped last year had to deal with them after her x husband falsely reported to CAS that she hurt her son. His motivation for this accussation was retaliation against mother because he was being investigated for deliquent support payments. The mother did not initiated this action the Ontario Works worker involved did this because he was making $40,000 was single living with his parents and paying $65. per month child support that was based lowere wages from years before. He pretended he was calling from the school. At 7 pm a female worker and two police officers one female and one male came to her door and knocked. She did not answer right away because she was in the shower. She came to the door dripping wet and the CAS worker started flipping out at her because she dared to delay in answering the door. She said because of the delay they were going to apprehend the child right there and then. The female officer was ready to go and wake the child up right then and drag him off. The male officer said wait a minute we better investigate whether the accussation was true or not. The two females relucantly aggreed and they went and woke the child up and asked him about a bruise he had on his back. He said half a sleep rubbing his eyes he was playing and he slipped back and hit his back on the corner of the bed and he showed them where. 

@font-face { font-family: "Times"; }@font-face { font-family: "Cambria"; }p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal { margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman"; }div.Section1 { page: Section1; }

The mother was so traumatized by this experience that she passed out when the CAS worker and officer said they were apprehending the child. But to these workers this is just business as usual. 

 

Even though CAS agreed the report was false and the mother got the school to write that the call was not from the school and the police traced the call to her x husbands house they still tried to pressure the mother into signing a supervision agreement so they could get more money for an openned file. 

 

The mother had plenty of back up including her child’s school so the CAS backed off but what of the thousands of others who lose their children in this cat and mouse game. The CAS uses teams of workers and teams of lawyers to emotionally beat these mothers into submission so they can make the case against them and apprehends their children. It is criminal and it has got to stop soon as it is devasting children and their families.

 

Discussion on the Light Rail Transit between Alex Cullen and Jane Scharf
Topic: CITY HALL REFORM

 Here is a link to a discussion between Alex Cullen and Jane Scharf on the 2.1 Billion dollar LRT deal.

 

 http://www.archive.org/details/LightRailTransit-DiscussionBetweenAlexCullenAndJaneScharfCandidates

Court Reform
Topic: RBC Arson Fire

Today July 30 Max Radico and myself attended the courthouse at 161 Elgin to inquire about the court hearing dates for Matt Morgan-Brown and Roger Clement. Max and I both made inquiries about their present and past court appearances. The clerk at the criminal court was able to find both individuals on the computer easily and all the information requested was provided.

 

I credit the Deputy Minister of the Attorney General Ann Merrit for this great improvement in the availabity of hearing information for these two individuals. Shortly after a complaint was made to her office her assistant called and said they were going to take action on my complaint about information not being made public about Roger and Matt's hearing dates at the criminal counter.

 

What this improvement means is that anyone with an interest in this case can get all the required information about hearings if the want to attend and support or attend as a observer. 

 

This pubic accessibility helps support open hearings which helps promote fair process.

 

Now I need to find out why the lawyer Lawrence Greenspon did not file all the documents for Rogers Clement's bail review to go ahead on July 30 as schedule which is over a month from the time of his bail hearing.

 

 

 

Complaint to Deputy Minister of the the Attorney General
Topic: RBC Arson Fire

Auditor General of Canada, audit of the police spending G8 G20
Topic: RBC Arson Fire

Letter from the Alex Myer, Senior Communications Advisor-External Communications/Office of the Auditor General of Canada confirming an audit on the G8 and G20.

 

The Sun article states that an undercover officer was involved in the RBC Arson and had been working undercover gathering information leading up to the G8 and G20 for two years. Therefore, the expenses of this project need to be examined and it can determine if there were other undercover agents involved in the RBC Arson.

 

The Ombudsman of Ontario has also been asked to look at the police involvement with RBC Arson because this incident was used as rational to justify huge security spending for G8 and G20 and a secret law overriding civil rights.

 

http://www.archive.org/details/AuditorGeneralOfCanadaAuditOfThePoliceSpendingG8G20

Dan Sawyer and Friends pluse email between Jane Scharf and lawyer Lawrence Greenspon
Topic: RBC Arson Fire

 

 if this link does not open then copy and paste into your browser

  Dan Sawyer and Friends attacking Jane Scharf for raising questions of police involvement with the RBC arson

http://www.archive.org/details/DanSawyerAndFriends

 

 

email between Jane Scharf and Lawrence Greenspon about his poor defense of those charged with the RBC Arson

 http://www.archive.org/details/EmailBetweenLawyerLawrenceGreensponAndJaneScharfAboutRbcArsonFire